Thursday, February 16, 2012

The Plan


  1. Examining the work: Setting the Foundation - Discipline is the singular issue dealt with by educators since the beginning of the learning process. It has been known to keep the classroom, hallways, and every portion of the campus hostage in terms of deterring the practice of education. The supposition has to be made that existing root causes share commonality and relate directly to discipline issues. Upon discovery, classification and analysis, can there not be data to address potential issues that may arise in the future? Additionally, the beliefs and notions held by the faculty affect the effectiveness of the policies.  If this information were used to modify the current discipline plan, would a better learning environment not be created? There is a strong potential for the Information gained to be used in modifying the current discipline plan.
  2. Analyzing data – The data gained originating in both raw discipline referrals and staff input will be analyzed and classified in order to find the basis of my conclusions. 
  3. Developing deeper understanding – Part of this process will be anonymous feedback from the faculty via online surveys on three strategically designed dates. The attempt is to eliminate as much emotion from the data as possible.
  4. Self-Reflection – Some of the questions that will need to be addressed on an ongoing manner include the following; “Are the most appropriate and most effective questions being asked?”, “Should there be additional sources of data streams located?” , and “What other methods can be used to validate the data?”
  5. Exploring Programmatic Patterns – Through the process of classification, it should inherently identify any patterns that need addressing. These problems will be recognized and a solution will be applied.
  6. Determining direction – Much of what is accomplished will be guided by Liz Anthony, Cindy Furr, and myself. Through bi-weekly meetings and sharing of raw data the process will begin in April 2012.
  7. Taking action for school improvement – Early findings will be available in September 2012. Implementation of early modifications theoretically could begin as early as the fall of 2012. Our ongoing meetings can provide reflections that should influence the direction of these modifications.
  8. Sustaining improvement – After the completion of the plan, professional development can be provided to deliver these changes that affect the discipline plan and objectives. The message to the faculty and staff has to stress the process is an evolving and adaptive plan. These stakeholders have to understand the importance of their input, and equally the importance of their compliance in regards to the implementation.  

Wednesday, February 15, 2012

Action Plan Template

One thing that I have learned with zero room for doubt, this will change......


Action Planning Template
Goal: Discipline is the singular issue dealt with by educators since the beginning of the learning process. It has been known to keep the classroom, hallways, and every portion of the campus hostage in terms of deterring the practice of education. The supposition has to be made that existing root causes share commonality and relate directly to discipline issues. Upon discovery, classification and analysis, can there not be data to address potential issues that may arise in the future? Additionally, the beliefs and notions held by the faculty affect the effectiveness of the policies. If this information were used to modify the current discipline plan, would a more efficient learning environment not be created?
Action Steps(s):
Person(s) Responsible:
Timeline: Start/End
Needed Resources
Evaluation
Identify perceived notions regarding school discipline policies – Spring

Anthony Dodson
May 2012


Survey Monkey
Compile results from faculty and staff
Identify perceived notions regarding school discipline policies - Fall

Anthony Dodson
September 2012

Survey Monkey
Compile results from faculty and staff
Identify perceived notions regarding school discipline policies - Winter

Anthony Dodson
December 2012

Survey Monkey
Compile results from faculty and staff
Compile 2011-2012 discipline statistics


Anthony Dodson
Cindy Furr
June 2012

Eduphoria
Aggregation of data
Compile 2012-2013 discipline statistics



Anthony Dodson
Cindy Furr
May 2013

Eduphoria
Aggregation of data
Administration discipline updates
Anthony Dodson
Liz Anthony
Cindy Furr



April 2012 – April 2013
Eduphoria
This will allow continual adjustments and identifications of anomalies
Reconciliation and modifications








Anthony Dodson Liz Anthony
Cindy Furr

April 2013
Eduphoria
Policy changes addressed and potentially implemented





Thursday, February 9, 2012

The best laid plans of mice and men....

I'm happy to report there are no mice involved in this one.....

  1. Examining the work: Setting the Foundation - Discipline is the singular issue dealt with by educators since the beginning of the learning process. It has been known to keep the classroom, hallways, and every portion of the campus hostage in terms of deterring the practice of education. The supposition has to be made that existing root causes share commonality and relate directly to discipline issues. Upon discovery, classification and analysis, can there not be data to address potential issues that may arise in the future? Additionally, the beliefs and notions held by the faculty impact the effectiveness of the policies.  If this information were used to modify the current discipline plan, would a better learning environment not be created? There is a strong potential for the Information gained to be used in modifying the current discipline plan.
  2. Analyzing data – The data gained originating in both raw discipline referrals and staff input will be analyzed and classified in order to find the basis of my conclusions.  
  3. Developing deeper understanding – Part of this process will be anonymous feedback from the faculty via online surveys on three strategically designed dates. The attempt is to eliminate as much emotion from the data as possible.
  4. Self-Reflection – Some of the questions that will need to be addressed on an ongoing manner include the following; “Are the most appropriate and most effective questions being asked?”, “Should there be additional sources of data streams located?” , and “What other methods can be used to validate the data?”
  5. Exploring Programmatic Patterns – Through the process of classification, it should inherently identify any patterns that need addressing. These problems will be recognized and a solution will be applied.
  6. Determining direction – Much of what is accomplished will be guided by Liz Anthony, Cindy Furr, and myself. Through bi-weekly meetings and sharing of raw data the process will begin in April 2012.
  7. Taking action for school improvement – Early findings will be available in September 2012. Implementation of early modifications theoretically could begin as early as the fall of 2012. Our ongoing meetings can provide reflections that should influence the direction of these modifications.
  8. Sustaining improvement – After the completion of the plan, professional development can be   provided to deliver these changes that affect the discipline plan and objectives. The message to the faculty and staff has to stress the process is an evolving and adaptive plan. These stakeholders have to understand the importance of their input, and equally the importance of their compliance in regards to the implementation.